New Zealander Files Application for Stay of Proceedings in Landmark Espionage Case
Delays and Security Protocols Surrounding SIS-Related Charges

The case, which centers around the Security Intelligence Service (SIS), has been marred by an extended delay resulting from the establishment of security protocols, local media reported.
The accused, who faces 17 charges under the Armed Forces Discipline Act 1971, including espionage, had initially been charged in 2019. However, due to the highly sensitive nature of the information involved, the court adjourned for a year to ensure the necessary security procedures and recording equipment were in place.
The pre-trial hearing, which took place in March 2022 at Linton Military camp, saw the accused request disclosure of the information held against them.
The court, recognizing the classified nature of the evidence, took the necessary time to finalize a protocol for securely handling classified information during the Court Martial.
After a year-long hiatus, the proceedings resumed on March 31, 2023. The court subsequently issued a decision on September 13, 2023, granting non-party disclosure. The first non-party disclosure hearing was held on September 25, with a second scheduled for this week.
However, the accused's lawyer has now applied for a stay of proceedings, citing the prolonged delay as grounds for halting the case. The court, led by Chief Court Martial Judge Kevin Riordan, confirmed receipt of the application in a minute issued on Monday.
Due to the closed Court Martial proceedings, full details about the case remain suppressed. The identity and occupation of the accused have been kept confidential through a court order. The lack of available information has sparked curiosity among the public, eager to learn more about this unprecedented espionage case.
The application for a stay of proceedings based on delay adds another layer of complexity to an already intriguing legal battle.
As the court reviews the application, the outcome will undoubtedly have ramifications for future cases involving national security and espionage. The decision will likely shape the approach to balancing the need for security protocols with the right to a timely trial.
While the details of the case continue to be withheld, the significance of this espionage trial cannot be understated. It marks a pivotal moment in New Zealand's legal history, as the country grapples with the challenges posed by espionage and national security threats.
As the legal proceedings unfold, the outcome will undoubtedly reverberate within the halls of power and the public consciousness.
In the coming weeks, the court will carefully consider the application for a stay of proceedings. The decision will be eagerly awaited by legal experts, security agencies, and the general public alike.
As New Zealand stands at the precipice of a groundbreaking espionage trial, the nation holds its breath, awaiting the next chapter in this intriguing saga.